I am a student of Zen who not infrequently transgresses the
boundaries of Zen orthodoxy. For instance, I sometimes think that I am getting
somewhere, either in the practice or in the understanding of the practice. That
is a clear violation of the rule that one ought not harbor “gaining
ideas.” The desire to get something out of my practice is a crime for which I am happy to assume
guilt. Do I want to make progress? I do. Do I want to improve my understanding
of the process? I do. And why shouldn’t I? The more I learn about what is
happening when I sit on the zafu, the better I will be able to explain zazen to
others. It helps, of course, that zazen is fascinating in itself.
The notion that students of Zen can practice without motivation
of any kind is a non-starter. Whether one is willing to admit it or not, most
of us expect to feel better as a result of sitting for a while, as well we
should. If Zen is Buddhism, then we are promised relief from suffering. As
Katherine Thanas famously said of the commitment to daily sitting, “Try it. It
will change your life.” Realization of complete, unsurpassable awakening may be
the ultimate, but it is the gradual acquisition of mental acuity and
tranquility that keeps us coming back to the zendo. Those who sit for months and years without noting
any benefit will quit unless someone shows them how to make their zazen get
results.
But results are just what we are told not to expect. Zen is “useless,”
“good for nothing,” and so on. Dōgen Zenji himself tells us that “zazen is not shōzen,” meaning that the phrase “sitting
in dhyāna” is not to be taken to indicate a kind of training that leads to a
goal. Let me confess straightaway that I do not believe him. That kind of
advice, whether it comes from Dōgen or a contemporary master, is intended to
help us to reduce our expectations, to cease projecting ourselves into imagined
futures, and to focus on the sitting itself. In other words, it is an expedient
device. As such, it useful for certain people under certain circumstances and
should not be thought of as dogma.
The more interesting part of this inquiry is our answer to a
question that is bound to arise once we allow ourselves to enjoy the fruits of Zen practice without guilt, namely, “If zazen is not
useless—if it is really the sort of activity that has a method and a learning
curve—then what is it and how is it related to the central Buddhist practice of
establishing mindfulness?” I will attempt to answer this question from several
viewpoints in future posts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to kibbitz or send me a personal message via this box. Comments will be moderated.